This is where I get off

I’m going to say yes, because the simple fact is that we NEED to be intolerant of Islam. Because it is intolerant of all who remain outside of it.

A billion people are enslaved to this extremist, narrow minded, regressive “religion”, and just as we fought against slavery, communism, Nazism, and fascism, we need to fight against Islam.

Calling something a “religion” doesn’t make it off limits to criticism. And yet, somewhere along the line, we all decided it was not okay to criticize someone’s religion. But when that religion is responsible for a million lost souls, what are we to do?

Geert Wilder is right about Islam. It’s a sad fact but a true one nevertheless. This attempt at appeasement of a fascist ideology is going to end the same way Europe’s appeasement of Hitler did in the 30’s; with Europe writhing under the throes of an evil, murderous dictator.

If you want to see what happens when Islam takes control, then just look at ANY Muslim country. Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt…etc….Is that what you want, world? Because if something isn’t done to stop the spread of Islam, then that’s what you’re going to get. Europe prides itself on being a champion of progressive thinking and and the bastion of of human rights; Islam is the most extreme form of regression. I guess it’s possible to be so progressive that you come right back around to regression.

Paris is in the midst of a civil war that the media doesn’t want to name; they call it a war borne of poverty but make no mistake; it’s a religious war. The Netherlands is fast becoming a ghetto; this once haven of liberalism and progressive thinking is retreating from itself in an attempt at pacifying the nearly million Muslim immigrants who sequester themselves in ghettos and refuse to learn Dutch and then kill Dutch citizens like Theo Van Gogh for exercising their right of expression. London is sarcastically referred to as “Londonstan” and British teachers are “uncomfortable” teaching children about the Holocaust for fear of offending Muslims.

Muslims riot in protest every time someone says something about their religion that they disagree with. In my own conversations with “normal” Muslims I’ve been told that it is permissible to kill those who leave Islam, and I’ve had justification given for why it’s acceptable to physically discipline one’s wife and why it’s perfectly normal to have more than one (provided one can “afford” her). The vast number of Muslims I’ve spoken with have the intellectual maturity of children and their wholesale acceptance of a religion that removes their ability to think for themselves is what they would like to give the rest of the world.

Now, we can talk tolerance and acceptance all day long, but when, oh world, does tolerance become aiding and abetting? Why is it acceptable to be tolerant of intolerance?

The defense of so call intelligent people who can’t see what’s right before them is disturbing on so many levels. People so blindly and passionately trying to be “fair” and “tolerant” rather than simply dealing with the truth makes me despair for the fate of my beautiful planet and the people who inhabit it.

So yes, I say Geert does promote intolerance, but it is necessary. It was certainly fashionable to be intolerant of communism, Nazism, and fascism, and it needs to be okay to be intolerant of Islam.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS